China's Decentralized and Inegalitarian Developmental State

Resource type
Author/contributor
Title
China's Decentralized and Inegalitarian Developmental State
Abstract
This article investigates China's market reforms and rapid economic development from the late 1970s. The following questions are posed: (1) How did the Chinese 'peasant revolution' and the rural policies and institutions of Mao China influence the market reforms and subsequent economic development? (2) How does China's development after the market reforms relate to Marxist and Polanyian notions of proletarization and commodification of land and labour as preconditions of capitalist development? (3) To what extent and why does China's development after the market reforms diverge from East Asian growth with equity? (4) How does China's 'decentralized developmental state' influence its growth model and distribution? (5) The present Chinese government tries to promote greater equality and more domestic consumption. Is this a Polanyian 'double movement' in response to commodification of land and labour? How likely are these policies to succeed? These questions are addressed through historical-comparative analyses with comparisons of long-term rural dynamics of Mao China and the former Soviet Union. China after the market reforms is compared with England during its transition to agrarian capitalism and industrial capitalism from the sixteenth century through the early nineteenth century and with Taiwan and South Korea from the late 1940s until the 1980s.
Publication
Forum for Development Studies
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
407-433
Date
November 2012
Journal Abbr
Forum for Development Studies
Language
English
ISSN
08039410
Library Catalog
EBSCOhost
Citation
Nordhaug, Kristen. 2012. “China’s Decentralized and Inegalitarian Developmental State.” Forum for Development Studies 39 (3): 407–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2012.691428.
Publication year
Keywords
  • aggregate factor income distribution
  • current heterodox approaches: socialist
  • inflation
  • institutions and growth
  • institutions: design, formation, and operations
  • macroeconomic analyses of economic development
  • Marxian
  • money
  • socialist systems and transitional economies: national income, product, and expenditure
  • Sraffian
  • structure, scope, and performance of government

Comments and observations

Be the first to comment!
Please email us your comments, and we will gladly review your submission.