The future of planning at the 'end of history'

Resource type
Author/contributor
Title
The future of planning at the 'end of history'
Abstract
The hegemony of neoliberalism now poses a fundamental challenge to planners worldwide. Most influential in this regard has been Francis Fukuyama's 'end of history' ideology and its progenies - or mutations - such as the Third Way. A close reading of their proponents (especially Anthony Giddens) and critics (Perry Anderson, Pierre Bourdieu, Alex Callinicos, John Gray and others) with reference to the contrasting political-economic theories of Friedrich von Hayek and Karl Polanyi, however, reveals the fundamental contradictions of neoliberalism - especially between capitalism and democracy - and identifies for progressive planning the role of extending radical democracy to the realms of the state and the economy.
Publication
Planning Theory
Date
November 1, 2003
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
183-224
Journal Abbr
Planning Theory
ISSN
14730952
Language
English
Library Catalog
EBSCOhost
Citation
Goonewardena, Kanishka. 2003. “The Future of Planning at the ‘End of History.’” Planning Theory 2 (3): 183–224.
Publication year
Keywords
  • BOURDIEU, Pierre, 1930-2002
  • FUKUYAMA, Francis
  • GIDDENS, Anthony
  • HABERMAS, Jurgen
  • neoliberalism
  • planning
  • social democracy

Comments and observations

Be the first to comment!
Please email us your comments, and we will gladly review your submission.