The future of planning at the 'end of history'

Resource type
Author/contributor
Title
The future of planning at the 'end of history'
Abstract
The hegemony of neoliberalism now poses a fundamental challenge to planners worldwide. Most influential in this regard has been Francis Fukuyama's 'end of history' ideology and its progenies - or mutations - such as the Third Way. A close reading of their proponents (especially Anthony Giddens) and critics (Perry Anderson, Pierre Bourdieu, Alex Callinicos, John Gray and others) with reference to the contrasting political-economic theories of Friedrich von Hayek and Karl Polanyi, however, reveals the fundamental contradictions of neoliberalism - especially between capitalism and democracy - and identifies for progressive planning the role of extending radical democracy to the realms of the state and the economy.
Publication
Planning Theory
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
183-224
Date
November 1, 2003
Journal Abbr
Planning Theory
Language
English
ISSN
14730952
Library Catalog
EBSCOhost
Citation
Goonewardena, Kanishka. 2003. “The Future of Planning at the ‘End of History.’” Planning Theory 2 (3): 183–224.
Publication year
Keywords
  • BOURDIEU, Pierre, 1930-2002
  • FUKUYAMA, Francis
  • GIDDENS, Anthony
  • HABERMAS, Jurgen
  • neoliberalism
  • planning
  • social democracy

Comments and observations

Be the first to comment!
Please email us your comments, and we will gladly review your submission.