Non-market institutions and crime in US counties: Hayek v. Polanyi

Resource type
Author/contributor
Title
Non-market institutions and crime in US counties: Hayek v. Polanyi
Abstract
Karl Polanyi’s The great transformation emphasized the importance of non-market institutions for social equity and stability. In that same era, Friedrich Hayek postulated in The road to serfdom that superior economies were market-based and featured minimal government. I compare these worldviews in relation to property and violent crime. Using US county data, change in crime is modeled as a function of economic structure, economic conditions, and demographics. Consistent with Polanyi, the size of the public sector in the economy negatively associates with crime. Within the public sector, education is a critical crime-reducing function, more so than law enforcement. Industry diversity is positively associated with crime, contrary to Hayek. Manufacturing equates with lower crime and the size of the private non-profit sector is unrelated to crime. Overall the results favor Polanyi’s assertion that non-market institutions are necessary to counter the harsh outcomes arising from market economic systems.
Publication
Review of Social Economy
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
310-332
Date
2021-04-03
Language
English
ISSN
0034-6764
Short Title
Non-market institutions and crime in US counties
Accessed
2022-07-02, 12:39 a.m.
Library Catalog
Taylor and Francis+NEJM
Citation
Zullo, Roland. 2021. “Non-Market Institutions and Crime in US Counties: Hayek v. Polanyi.” Review of Social Economy 79(2): 310–32.
Publication year
Keywords
  • crime
  • H41 (public goods)
  • laissez-faire
  • non-market institutions
  • P17 (capitalism performance)
  • public goods
  • Socialism
  • Z13 (economic sociology)

Comments and observations

Be the first to comment!
Please email us your comments, and we will gladly review your submission.