Varieties of What? Should We Still Be Using the Concept of Capitalism?
Resource type
Author/contributor
- Block, Fred (Author)
Title
Varieties of What? Should We Still Be Using the Concept of Capitalism?
Abstract
This article argues that social scientists should reconsider the analytic value of the term "capitalism." The paper argues that the two most coherent definitions of capitalism are those derived from classical Marxism and from the Worm System theory of Immanuel Wallerstein. Marx and Engels' formulation was basically a genetic theory in which the structure of a mode of production is determined by the mode of surplus extraction. During the course of the 20th century, however, Marxist theorists had to modify this framework and the result has been an uncomfortable hybrid. Wallerstein resolved these tensions by redefining capitalism in terms of the logic of a worm system. However, his argument has difficulty in explaining the consequential variations over time in the specific rules and institutional structures that operate at the global level. The article goes on to argue in favor of Karl Polanyi's concept of market society because it focuses attention on the political governance of market societies at both the national and the global levels.
Publication
Political Power & Social Theory
Volume
23
Pages
269-291
Date
January 2012
Journal Abbr
Political Power & Social Theory
Language
English
ISSN
01988719
Short Title
Varieties of What?
Library Catalog
EBSCOhost
Citation
Block, Fred. 2012. “Varieties of What? Should We Still Be Using the Concept of Capitalism?” Political Power & Social Theory 23: 269–91. DOI: 10.1108/S0198-8719(2012)0000023013.
Discipline
Publication year
Keywords
- capitalism
- Marxist philosophy
- mixed economy
- political science
- public administration
- variational principles
Link to this record
Comments and observations
Be the first to comment!
Please email us your comments, and we will gladly review your submission.