Karl Polanyi, Marshall Sahlins, and the Study of Ancient Social Relations

Resource type
Author/contributor
Title
Karl Polanyi, Marshall Sahlins, and the Study of Ancient Social Relations
Abstract
Questions arise whenever social-scientific models are used in analysis of ancient texts, particularly regarding the feasibility of their application to social and cultural milieux different from those from which they were derived. An essay I authored that assessed the command in Luke 6 to "love your enemies" from the perspective of ancient reciprocity ethics, and that invoked Marshall Sahlins's taxonomy of reciprocity relations (general, balanced, and negative reciprocity), was queried by Zeba Crook on precisely this point, namely, whether it applied Sahlins's taxonomy to Greco-Roman reciprocity relations without adequate attention to the distinctions between kinship organized tribal societies (the focus of Sahlins's analysis) and the socially stratified agrarian societies characteristic of the ancient Mediterranean world.1 Crook's piece was more than just a critique on that point; it raised questions about the extent to which Sahlins's model has applicability to the Roman world. This essay will focus on this key point and, it is hoped, will also contribute to the discussion on the use of social-scientific research in biblical studies.
Publication
Journal of Biblical Literature
Volume
126
Issue
1
Pages
182-191
Date
2007
Journal Abbr
Journal of Biblical Literature
Language
English
ISSN
0021-9231
Accessed
2017-01-10, 7:04 p.m.
Library Catalog
JSTOR
Citation
Kirk, Alan. 2007. “Karl Polanyi, Marshall Sahlins, and the Study of Ancient Social Relations.” Journal of Biblical Literature 126 (1): 182–91. DOI: 10.2307/27638428.
Publication year
Keywords
  • biblical studies
  • clientelism
  • cognitive models
  • economic models
  • kinship
  • reciprocity
  • SAHLINS, Marshall
  • slave trade
  • social interaction
  • stone age

Comments and observations

Be the first to comment!
Please email us your comments, and we will gladly review your submission.