Pi̇yasa: Adam Smith Versus Karl Polanyi̇

Resource type
Author/contributor
Title
Pi̇yasa: Adam Smith Versus Karl Polanyi̇
Abstract
In this study author will try to make comparative analysis of Adam Smith and Karl Polanyi's ideas about market. According to Smith market is a mechanism which allocating resources through invisible hand. Contrary to Smith, Polanyi, asserts that a market is a intervention style to economy. Intervention is an inherent property of market. In the first part of this study Adam Smith's opinions about market which assings limited duty to state and defends social interest will come true through invisible hand will be examined. Second part will concentrate on Karl Polanyi's arguments against appear of market society and market economy. At the end of the study, the author has tried to analyse two different market conceptualization and to assert how well this approaches to understand our times. (English)
Publication
Academic Review of Economics & Administrative Sciences
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
127-137
Date
July 2013
Journal Abbr
Academic Review of Economics & Administrative Sciences
Language
Turkish
Short Title
Pi̇yasa
Library Catalog
EBSCOhost
Citation
Gökten, Yeliz SARIÖZ. 2013. “Pi̇yasa: Adam Smith Versus Karl Polanyi̇.” Academic Review of Economics & Administrative Sciences 6 (2): 127–37.
Publication year
Keywords
  • comparative studies
  • economic research
  • economists
  • market
  • market system
  • Piyasa
  • Piyasa Sistemi
  • SMITH, Adam, 1723-1790

Comments and observations

Be the first to comment!
Please email us your comments, and we will gladly review your submission.