Full bibliography
Urban poverty and regulation, new spaces and old: Japan and the US in comparison
Resource type
Author/contributor
- Mahito Hayashi (Author)
Title
Urban poverty and regulation, new spaces and old: Japan and the US in comparison
Abstract
After the 1970s the new urban poverty (NUP) ballooned in Japan and the US, and it evoked policy responses that produced new, rescaled regulatory spaces to contain the poor on the fringe of social rights and the capital circuit. The paper illuminates this process through the comparison of Japanese and US trajectories, both of which, evolving through economic crises, have established unique pathways. The author first constructs a theoretical framework based on Marxian, Polanyian, and Lefebvrean traditions. Then, he compares national-scale poverty regulation in Japan and the US from the 1950s through the 2000s. Lastly, the author examines how the countries' regulation of a major aspect of the NUP--homelessness--intensified multiscalar reseating processes. The paper concludes that regulation of the NUP represents a significant instance of uneven spatial development of capitalism mediated by the state that requires synthetic research.
Publication
Environment & Planning A
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
1203-1225
Date
May 2014
Journal Abbr
Environment & Planning A
Language
English
DOI
ISSN
0308518X
Short Title
Urban poverty and regulation, new spaces and old
Library Catalog
EBSCOhost
Citation
Mahito Hayashi. 2014. “Urban Poverty and Regulation, New Spaces and Old: Japan and the US in Comparison.” Environment & Planning A 46 (5): 1203–25. DOI: 10.1068/a4621.
Discipline
Publication year
Keywords
- capitalism
- comparative studies
- economic development
- financial crises
- financial crisis
- ghettoization
- homelessness
- Japan
- rescaling
- the capital circuit
- the new urban poverty
- the regulation approach
- uneven spatial development
- United States
- urban poor
Link to this record
Comments and observations
Be the first to comment!
Please email us your comments, and we will gladly review your submission.